This question came in response to The case for dividing classes by belt rank, given my�flexible stance on “the basics.”
Q: Does your new�approach to divided classes change your “anything can be a fundamental�technique” stance?
Thanks–I’m appreciating that you’re making your expertise so available to�the community.
A: The divisions between classes have less to do my philosophy about basic versus advanced techniques and more to do with the right way of teaching and structuring classes for different kinds of students. Even if I think all …
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/aesopian/~3/nK7SiBERQzA/
No comments:
Post a Comment